[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Compiling problem with Linrad 0104 in Mandrake 9.1



Leif Asbrink wrote:

All right.

I have just installed 0104 version in the 486 mandrake 6.1 and it
works(I goes very smooth with fft2 disabled, but when I set ftt2 on svgalib gets a "segmentation fault reveived") but I CAN NOT compile it in
the Mandrake 9.1 with the athlon.

I get the following error at the beginning of the compiling session,
when compiling uivar.c file:

[root@xxxxxxxxx linrad-01.04]# make
gcc -O -W -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wformat \
-Wunused -Wcomment -Wchar-subscripts -Wshadow -Wuninitialized \
-Wparentheses -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror -ffast-math -fforce-mem \
-fomit-frame-pointer -c -o main.o \
main.c
gcc -O -W -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wformat \
-Wunused -Wcomment -Wchar-subscripts -Wshadow -Wuninitialized \
-Wparentheses -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror -ffast-math -fforce-mem \
-fomit-frame-pointer -c -o ui.o \
ui.c
gcc -O -W -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wformat \
-Wunused -Wcomment -Wchar-subscripts -Wshadow -Wuninitialized \
-Wparentheses -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror -ffast-math -fforce-mem \
-fomit-frame-pointer -c -o setvga.o \
setvga.c
gcc -O -W -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wformat \
-Wunused -Wcomment -Wchar-subscripts -Wshadow -Wuninitialized \
-Wparentheses -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror -ffast-math -fforce-mem \
-fomit-frame-pointer -c -o uivar.o \
uivar.c
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
uivar.c:334: warning: excess elements in array initializer
uivar.c:334: warning: (near initialization for `cg_floatpar_text')
uivar.c:343: warning: excess elements in array initializer
uivar.c:343: warning: (near initialization for `eg_floatpar_text')
make: *** [uivar.o] Error 1
[root@xxxxxxxxx linrad-01.04]#


I like this new version, I like the new waterfall and the parameters
config included in the graph, saving space on the screen.
I'll tell you more new as I play enough with all versions.


73, Ramiro

I am very interested to know if there is any noticeable
performance difference between the versions. Try to
decrease bandwidth and try inefficient screen operations
(large waterfall or very small averaging numbers together
with small fft sizes) until you reach the performance limit
where it does not work any longer. I am very interested to
know if there is a significant difference between versions.

I am also interested to know how far you can get on a 486.
Linrad-01.04 has a qrss mode that might allow very narrow
filters, 0.01 Hz or so on a 486. Does it work or not?

Any observation of unexpected behaviour is interesting.


73

Leif








LINRADDARNIL