[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [linrad] Silly question or is it?

To: linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [linrad] Silly question or is it?
From: Werfried Kuneth <oe8fnk@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:42:04 +0000
In-reply-to: <KGECLDDCJAGJEAKACLMMOENFEFAA.conrad@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

1st let me say that the I appreciate the discussion on this list and the work of Leif very much! I wish I could contribute more. 

you wrote:
>When you go to IQ this gets twice as wide....

Yes, the "original" IF bandwidth of, say 96 khz is changed to +48 khz (real) .... 0 khz .... and "minus" 48 khz. I simply write "minus" here, the correct notation would be something "complex" 48 khz. And then put a label 0-96 Khz on it again :-)  I am now yet 100% sure. 

Still looking for a receiver design that receives more that one tv-video carrier with low bandwidth (<500 Hz). 

73,
Fred, oe8fnk
www.qsl.net/oe8fnk

LINRADDARNIL

References:
- [linrad] Silly question or is it?
  - From: Conrad G0RUZ

Prev by Date: Re: [linrad] Silly question or is it?
Next by Date: RE: [linrad] Silly question or is it?
Previous by thread: Re: [linrad] Silly question or is it?
Next by thread: RE: [linrad] Silly question or is it?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread