[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [linrad] Re:Mixers

To: linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stoskopf@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [linrad] Re:Mixers
From: Lawrence Stoskopf <stoskopf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 17:03:08 -0500
References: <3ed6a3ff.f7e7ab6f.13103@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3ED6C37E.4050103@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 (NSCD7.01)

Just took a look at Analog's mixers at   www.analog.com/bulletins/switch-mux

Interesting to see that their ADG918 specs list:   (a single, not quad 
device)

    On switching time 5 ns
    Off switching time 4 ns

    1dB compresson P-1dBm DC to 1000 MHz 20 dBm

    Third Order Intermodulation Intercept IP3  900 MHz, 5 dBm  35 dBm

Looks like someone is looking at the (as they say in the medical 
literature) off label uses!

And results pretty well in line with some of the Ham results published.

N0UU

LINRADDARNIL

References:
- [linrad] Fwd: H-Mode Mixer emails
  - From: w3sz
- [linrad] Re:Mixers
  - From: Lawrence Stoskopf

Prev by Date: [linrad] linrad =running
Next by Date: [linrad] lir00-56.tgz vs lir00-56.tbz
Previous by thread: [linrad] Re:Mixers
Next by thread: [linrad] linrad =running
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread